I have my own long-term experiment going on: Any peer-reviewed (that is, scientific) research in any area at all, what in your specialty supports the Darwin hypothesis over the alternative(s). Going on nearly 50 years now, nobody has ever offered an answer. I look at their websites where they talk about their research (often honestly), and there's no evidence of it there either.
A couple years ago I noticed this has something to say about human inventions: they cannot happen. Actually they do happen, but it's not possible in a naturalistic world. The Bible has something to say about that also:
If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to him. -- James 1:5, oNIVThe word "all" is kind of vague, but it means "everyone" (not just the believers). In another context Jesus said that God gives His rain to the righteous and the wicked alike. The source of all human invention is God alone. It's the scientific "Entropy" law. There are no exceptions. We (believers) can ask for it, and God will give us extra. The Bible says so.
For several years now -- I started somewhere around 2015, then took a 7-year break teaching programming to hich school students, but started over in 2022 -- I have been writing a computer program (this is the information domain, subject to the Entropy law), which I do the grunt coding, but all of the new ideas come from God. I get stuck often -- like this week -- and I ask for God's help, and He gives it to me, usually the next day, sometimes sooner. That happened again today. I know Who to thank, the atheist programmers do not.